<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenID: A mechanism for locked blog posts? (Or: Free at last)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brainonfire.net/2007/12/09/openid-for-locked-blog-posts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brainonfire.net/2007/12/09/openid-for-locked-blog-posts/</link>
	<description>Tim McCormack, distilled.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: akb427</title>
		<link>http://www.brainonfire.net/2007/12/09/openid-for-locked-blog-posts/#comment-18893</link>
		<dc:creator>akb427</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 06:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brainonfire.net/2007/12/09/openid-for-locked-blog-posts/#comment-18893</guid>
		<description>Google is working on a set of APIs called OpenSocial to deal with some of this problem space. Unclear to me if they are definitely going with OpenID, but some quick searches indicate that it's at least in contention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is working on a set of APIs called OpenSocial to deal with some of this problem space. Unclear to me if they are definitely going with OpenID, but some quick searches indicate that it's at least in contention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
